NSA Director Exposes Media’s Role in Collusion Hoax
Submitted by MAGA Student
Posted 2 days ago
**Truth Unveiled: NSA Director Confirms Media's Role in the Russian Collusion Hoax**
In an eye-opening revelation, the former National Security Agency (NSA) Director, Admiral Mike Rogers, has exposed the misrepresentation of facts that fueled the infamous Russian collusion narrative.
Documents recently declassified shed light on conversations between Admiral Rogers and FBI officials, particularly addressing a critical Washington Post article that helped propel the narrative of collusion between President Trump and Russia.
According to Rogers, the story was fundamentally "wrong," directly countering the claims made by the media that President Trump had urged intelligence officials to publicly deny any evidence of collusion.
The key article in question, published in May 2017, asserted that Trump had attempted to influence intelligence leaders to undermine the ongoing FBI investigation into his campaign’s alleged ties to Russia.
However, Rogers, speaking to investigators shortly after the article's release, stated that the media's characterization was simply not accurate.
He clarified that Trump’s inquiries were limited to the existence of signals intelligence evidence, not a directive to squash the investigation.
As the media continues to be scrutinized for its role in perpetuating false narratives, this new information raises pertinent questions about the integrity of reporting and the motivations behind sensationalist journalism.
Trump has consistently labeled the collusion claims as a “hoax,” arguing that mainstream media outlets have muddied the waters of public understanding with false narratives aimed at disparaging his presidency.
Admiral Rogers' testimony serves to strengthen the former president's case as he seeks justice through legal means against the Pulitzer Prize Board for defending the very articles that now appear fundamentally flawed.
The implications of these revelations stretch far beyond the past—it calls into question the accountability of powerful media entities and their influence on public perception, especially regarding critical national issues.
As Trump faces ongoing legal battles revolving around these narratives, Admiral Rogers’ statements remind us of the importance of seeking the truth in an era overwhelmed by misinformation.
The narrative surrounding the Trump administration has been shaped significantly by what now appears to be demonstrably false accounts, and it remains crucial that the American public remains vigilant in demanding honesty from all corners of media.
Moving forward, as Trump takes the stage once again, this narrative may be at the forefront of the discussion.
Will the mainstream media adjust course in how they report on the facts regarding former President Trump, or will the public demand accountability for the misinformation that has historically marred his presidency?
The unfolding legal pursuits and revelations present a compelling look into the intersection of media, politics, and national security—a complex landscape that will shape the future of discourse in America.
Sources:
100percentfedup.com
justthenews.com
outkick.com
In an eye-opening revelation, the former National Security Agency (NSA) Director, Admiral Mike Rogers, has exposed the misrepresentation of facts that fueled the infamous Russian collusion narrative.
Documents recently declassified shed light on conversations between Admiral Rogers and FBI officials, particularly addressing a critical Washington Post article that helped propel the narrative of collusion between President Trump and Russia.
According to Rogers, the story was fundamentally "wrong," directly countering the claims made by the media that President Trump had urged intelligence officials to publicly deny any evidence of collusion.
The key article in question, published in May 2017, asserted that Trump had attempted to influence intelligence leaders to undermine the ongoing FBI investigation into his campaign’s alleged ties to Russia.
However, Rogers, speaking to investigators shortly after the article's release, stated that the media's characterization was simply not accurate.
He clarified that Trump’s inquiries were limited to the existence of signals intelligence evidence, not a directive to squash the investigation.
As the media continues to be scrutinized for its role in perpetuating false narratives, this new information raises pertinent questions about the integrity of reporting and the motivations behind sensationalist journalism.
Trump has consistently labeled the collusion claims as a “hoax,” arguing that mainstream media outlets have muddied the waters of public understanding with false narratives aimed at disparaging his presidency.
Admiral Rogers' testimony serves to strengthen the former president's case as he seeks justice through legal means against the Pulitzer Prize Board for defending the very articles that now appear fundamentally flawed.
The implications of these revelations stretch far beyond the past—it calls into question the accountability of powerful media entities and their influence on public perception, especially regarding critical national issues.
As Trump faces ongoing legal battles revolving around these narratives, Admiral Rogers’ statements remind us of the importance of seeking the truth in an era overwhelmed by misinformation.
The narrative surrounding the Trump administration has been shaped significantly by what now appears to be demonstrably false accounts, and it remains crucial that the American public remains vigilant in demanding honesty from all corners of media.
Moving forward, as Trump takes the stage once again, this narrative may be at the forefront of the discussion.
Will the mainstream media adjust course in how they report on the facts regarding former President Trump, or will the public demand accountability for the misinformation that has historically marred his presidency?
The unfolding legal pursuits and revelations present a compelling look into the intersection of media, politics, and national security—a complex landscape that will shape the future of discourse in America.
Sources:
100percentfedup.com
justthenews.com
outkick.com
Latest News