Election Integrity at Stake: Democrats Breaking Law
Submitted by MAGA Student
Posted 4 days ago
**Election Integrity Under Fire: Democrats Accused of Counting Illegal Ballots in Pennsylvania Senate Race**
In a startling revelation, Democratic officials in Pennsylvania are openly defying state law and court rulings by counting disqualified ballots in the closely contested Senate race between Republican Dave McCormick and incumbent Democrat Bob Casey.
With the election outcome hanging in the balance, McCormick currently leads by a margin of 26,000 votes, having emerged as the Republican candidate following a heated primary.
However, the situation has become increasingly contentious as Casey refuses to concede and continues to push for the inclusion of every vote, regardless of legality.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court had previously ruled that mail-in ballots lacking the required signatures or dates should not be permitted in official counts.
In stark opposition, Democrats in Philadelphia and surrounding counties are alleged to be ignoring this order, alarming many who prioritize election integrity.
Bucks County Commissioner Diane Ellis-Marseglia's statements encapsulate this dubious approach. She suggested that legal accountability should take a backseat to what she deems essential for ensuring every vote is counted.
Republicans, led by the Republican National Committee (RNC), have responded with firm assertions against this perceived election interference. RNC Chairman Michael Whatley criticized Democrats for attempting to “steal a Senate seat” by disregarding established legal standards.
Whatley emphasized the crucial importance of adhering to election law in maintaining voter confidence, labeling these actions as a blatant attempt to undermine the system.
The allegations of counting dubious ballots come at a time when voters are increasingly concerned about the integrity of electoral processes nationwide.
The RNC has actively pursued legal action, aiming to uphold the validity of McCormick’s victory amidst these contentious recount efforts.
As the recount progresses, both sides have engaged in intense legal battles over hundreds of disputed ballots, displaying the sharp divide that has taken hold in Pennsylvania politics.
While the Democrats argue that disqualifying ballots due to clerical errors disenfranchises voters, Republicans are steadfast in their assertion that the rule of law must prevail in the counting process.
The implications for both the Pennsylvania race and the broader political landscape are profound, as the outcome could tilt the balance of power in the Senate and raise further questions about election integrity and the adherence to the rule of law.
As the countdown to the final results continues, the eyes of the nation remain fixed on Pennsylvania, where the struggle for what constitutes a legitimate vote is playing out in real time.
Sources:
yahoo.com
campusreform.org
campusreform.org
In a startling revelation, Democratic officials in Pennsylvania are openly defying state law and court rulings by counting disqualified ballots in the closely contested Senate race between Republican Dave McCormick and incumbent Democrat Bob Casey.
With the election outcome hanging in the balance, McCormick currently leads by a margin of 26,000 votes, having emerged as the Republican candidate following a heated primary.
However, the situation has become increasingly contentious as Casey refuses to concede and continues to push for the inclusion of every vote, regardless of legality.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court had previously ruled that mail-in ballots lacking the required signatures or dates should not be permitted in official counts.
In stark opposition, Democrats in Philadelphia and surrounding counties are alleged to be ignoring this order, alarming many who prioritize election integrity.
Bucks County Commissioner Diane Ellis-Marseglia's statements encapsulate this dubious approach. She suggested that legal accountability should take a backseat to what she deems essential for ensuring every vote is counted.
Republicans, led by the Republican National Committee (RNC), have responded with firm assertions against this perceived election interference. RNC Chairman Michael Whatley criticized Democrats for attempting to “steal a Senate seat” by disregarding established legal standards.
Whatley emphasized the crucial importance of adhering to election law in maintaining voter confidence, labeling these actions as a blatant attempt to undermine the system.
The allegations of counting dubious ballots come at a time when voters are increasingly concerned about the integrity of electoral processes nationwide.
The RNC has actively pursued legal action, aiming to uphold the validity of McCormick’s victory amidst these contentious recount efforts.
As the recount progresses, both sides have engaged in intense legal battles over hundreds of disputed ballots, displaying the sharp divide that has taken hold in Pennsylvania politics.
While the Democrats argue that disqualifying ballots due to clerical errors disenfranchises voters, Republicans are steadfast in their assertion that the rule of law must prevail in the counting process.
The implications for both the Pennsylvania race and the broader political landscape are profound, as the outcome could tilt the balance of power in the Senate and raise further questions about election integrity and the adherence to the rule of law.
As the countdown to the final results continues, the eyes of the nation remain fixed on Pennsylvania, where the struggle for what constitutes a legitimate vote is playing out in real time.
Sources:
yahoo.com
campusreform.org
campusreform.org
Latest News