Manhattan DA Drops Charges: Protesters Off the Hook
Submitted by MAGA Student
Posted 5 days ago
Manhattan DA drops charges against most of the Columbia University protesters
In a surprising turn of events, nearly all of the people who were arrested inside Columbia University’s Hamilton Hall last month had their cases dropped by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office.
Of the 46 people charged with trespassing in connection with the building’s occupation, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office dismissed cases against 31 people largely due to a lack of evidence. Prosecutors told 14 others that their cases would be dropped if they avoid being arrested in the next six months, but those defendants rejected that offer and will be due back in court on July 25.
The remaining defendant, James Carlson, has two other open cases against him involving separate charges, including flag burning. Carlson has no affiliation with the school.
Protesters had seized the building on the Manhattan campus of Columbia University on April 30 as demonstrations against the war in Gaza erupted on some U.S. college campuses and as tensions at Columbia intensified over mass suspensions.
Dozens were arrested the next day when police with riot helmets cleared the damaged and barricaded building.
Those arrested included at least 14 Columbia undergraduates, nine graduate students, two employees and six students from affiliated schools, a Columbia spokesperson previously said. At least 13 of them had no affiliation with Columbia, the school said.
The 31 people whose cases were dismissed were students or staff at Columbia, Barnard or Union Theological Seminary. Of the defendants who would have later had their cases dismissed, pending no further arrests, 12 were not staff members or students at Columbia and two were students, the district attorney’s office said.
At a news conference after the hearing, some of them, flanked by supporters, said they rejected the prosecutors’ conditional dismissal to show solidarity with those facing the most extreme repression across the pro-Palestinian movement.
During the court appearances Thursday afternoon, a prosecutor said the defendants do not have criminal histories and that they will face internal disciplinary proceedings at Columbia.
A Columbia University official said the disciplinary process is ongoing but declined to comment further.
The prosecutor said it would have been “extremely difficult” to prove the dismissed cases because the district attorney’s office lacks evidence, including surveillance footage from cameras that were covered up. The fact that some of the defendants wore masks also made it difficult to identify their specific actions.
An attorney for the defendants asked the court to immediately dismiss the charges against all of the accused, saying there are no allegations that the defendants hurt people or damaged property.
In the downtown courtroom, some of the defendants wore face masks and some wore kaffiyehs, which are distinctly patterned Palestinian scarves. At least two wore sunglasses.
As the hearings began, police confiscated what appeared to be a protest sign found under one of the seats.
When a prosecutor told the court that Carlson was accused of burning an Israeli flag, some of the defendants seated in the room could be heard snickering. A police officer instructed them to be quiet.
Hamilton Hall was famously occupied by people protesting the Vietnam War in 1968.
The decision to drop the charges against the protesters has been met with mixed reactions. Some have praised the district attorney’s office for recognizing the lack of evidence and avoiding unnecessary prosecutions, while others have criticized the decision as a failure to hold the protesters accountable for their actions.
It is worth noting that the protesters were not charged with any violent crimes, and the district attorney’s office has stated that they do not have criminal histories. However, some have argued that the protesters should still be held accountable for their actions, regardless of whether or not they caused any physical harm.
The decision to drop the charges against the protesters also raises questions about the role of universities in handling protests and demonstrations on their campuses. Some have argued that universities should take a more active role in addressing these issues, rather than relying on law enforcement to handle them.
Regardless of one’s opinion on the matter, it is clear that the decision to drop the charges against the protesters will have a significant impact on the ongoing debate over the role of universities in addressing protests and demonstrations on their campuses.
Sources:
nbcnews.com
headlineusa.com
twitchy.com
In a surprising turn of events, nearly all of the people who were arrested inside Columbia University’s Hamilton Hall last month had their cases dropped by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office.
Of the 46 people charged with trespassing in connection with the building’s occupation, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office dismissed cases against 31 people largely due to a lack of evidence. Prosecutors told 14 others that their cases would be dropped if they avoid being arrested in the next six months, but those defendants rejected that offer and will be due back in court on July 25.
The remaining defendant, James Carlson, has two other open cases against him involving separate charges, including flag burning. Carlson has no affiliation with the school.
Protesters had seized the building on the Manhattan campus of Columbia University on April 30 as demonstrations against the war in Gaza erupted on some U.S. college campuses and as tensions at Columbia intensified over mass suspensions.
Dozens were arrested the next day when police with riot helmets cleared the damaged and barricaded building.
Those arrested included at least 14 Columbia undergraduates, nine graduate students, two employees and six students from affiliated schools, a Columbia spokesperson previously said. At least 13 of them had no affiliation with Columbia, the school said.
The 31 people whose cases were dismissed were students or staff at Columbia, Barnard or Union Theological Seminary. Of the defendants who would have later had their cases dismissed, pending no further arrests, 12 were not staff members or students at Columbia and two were students, the district attorney’s office said.
At a news conference after the hearing, some of them, flanked by supporters, said they rejected the prosecutors’ conditional dismissal to show solidarity with those facing the most extreme repression across the pro-Palestinian movement.
During the court appearances Thursday afternoon, a prosecutor said the defendants do not have criminal histories and that they will face internal disciplinary proceedings at Columbia.
A Columbia University official said the disciplinary process is ongoing but declined to comment further.
The prosecutor said it would have been “extremely difficult” to prove the dismissed cases because the district attorney’s office lacks evidence, including surveillance footage from cameras that were covered up. The fact that some of the defendants wore masks also made it difficult to identify their specific actions.
An attorney for the defendants asked the court to immediately dismiss the charges against all of the accused, saying there are no allegations that the defendants hurt people or damaged property.
In the downtown courtroom, some of the defendants wore face masks and some wore kaffiyehs, which are distinctly patterned Palestinian scarves. At least two wore sunglasses.
As the hearings began, police confiscated what appeared to be a protest sign found under one of the seats.
When a prosecutor told the court that Carlson was accused of burning an Israeli flag, some of the defendants seated in the room could be heard snickering. A police officer instructed them to be quiet.
Hamilton Hall was famously occupied by people protesting the Vietnam War in 1968.
The decision to drop the charges against the protesters has been met with mixed reactions. Some have praised the district attorney’s office for recognizing the lack of evidence and avoiding unnecessary prosecutions, while others have criticized the decision as a failure to hold the protesters accountable for their actions.
It is worth noting that the protesters were not charged with any violent crimes, and the district attorney’s office has stated that they do not have criminal histories. However, some have argued that the protesters should still be held accountable for their actions, regardless of whether or not they caused any physical harm.
The decision to drop the charges against the protesters also raises questions about the role of universities in handling protests and demonstrations on their campuses. Some have argued that universities should take a more active role in addressing these issues, rather than relying on law enforcement to handle them.
Regardless of one’s opinion on the matter, it is clear that the decision to drop the charges against the protesters will have a significant impact on the ongoing debate over the role of universities in addressing protests and demonstrations on their campuses.
Sources:
nbcnews.com
headlineusa.com
twitchy.com
