Biden's DOJ: Silencing Parents at School Board Meetings
Submitted by MAGA Student
Posted 6 hours ago
**Parents Under Siege: Biden's DOJ Targets Concerned Citizens at School Board Meetings**
In a shocking revelation, it has come to light that the Biden administration's Department of Justice (DOJ) actively sought to silence parents voicing their concerns at school board meetings.
Documents obtained by America First Legal (AFL) reveal that despite warnings from FBI officials and the National Sheriffs' Association, former Attorney General Merrick Garland's October 2021 memorandum labeled concerned parents as potential threats.
This alarming move followed a wave of increased parental involvement in local education, particularly during the pandemic, when many parents first discovered unacceptable curriculum choices and ideologies being introduced in schools.
On the very day the controversial memo was released, FBI Deputy Assistant Director Jay Greenberg expressed concerns about the strategy, requesting more time to engage on the issue before action was taken.
Comments from various DOJ officials exemplify the tension within the department itself regarding the potential backlash of this memo. One official lamented that the strategy could "nuke our election threat efforts," signifying the awareness of political repercussions among those directly involved.
The conclusion reached by the National Sheriffs' Association was equally critical, noting that local sheriffs had not reported any threats to school boards, countering the DOJ's narrative that justified their heavy-handed tactics.
In Garland's memo, he stated, “Threats against public servants are not only illegal, they run counter to our nation’s core values.” Yet, this aggressive stance towards ordinary parents advocating for their children raises serious questions about the administration’s priorities.
Instead of addressing legitimate parental concerns regarding educational content, the DOJ has chosen to criminalize the voices of citizens who simply seek to protect their children’s education.
As the Biden administration continues to escalate its tactics against those who believe they are entitled to free speech, it serves as a stark reminder of the lengths to which they will go to quash dissent.
A fair and balanced education should include the input of parents, not a federal crackdown on concerned citizens. The implications of this campaign against parents represent a growing erosion of liberty that many Americans hold dear.
With the revelations of this internal clashing within the DOJ, there is hope that the voices echoing in school board meetings will not be silenced. Indeed, the necessity for parental involvement in education has never been more critical, as they advocate not only for their children but for the future of American values.
Sources:
rairfoundation.com
justthenews.com
thepiratescove.us
In a shocking revelation, it has come to light that the Biden administration's Department of Justice (DOJ) actively sought to silence parents voicing their concerns at school board meetings.
Documents obtained by America First Legal (AFL) reveal that despite warnings from FBI officials and the National Sheriffs' Association, former Attorney General Merrick Garland's October 2021 memorandum labeled concerned parents as potential threats.
This alarming move followed a wave of increased parental involvement in local education, particularly during the pandemic, when many parents first discovered unacceptable curriculum choices and ideologies being introduced in schools.
On the very day the controversial memo was released, FBI Deputy Assistant Director Jay Greenberg expressed concerns about the strategy, requesting more time to engage on the issue before action was taken.
Comments from various DOJ officials exemplify the tension within the department itself regarding the potential backlash of this memo. One official lamented that the strategy could "nuke our election threat efforts," signifying the awareness of political repercussions among those directly involved.
The conclusion reached by the National Sheriffs' Association was equally critical, noting that local sheriffs had not reported any threats to school boards, countering the DOJ's narrative that justified their heavy-handed tactics.
In Garland's memo, he stated, “Threats against public servants are not only illegal, they run counter to our nation’s core values.” Yet, this aggressive stance towards ordinary parents advocating for their children raises serious questions about the administration’s priorities.
Instead of addressing legitimate parental concerns regarding educational content, the DOJ has chosen to criminalize the voices of citizens who simply seek to protect their children’s education.
As the Biden administration continues to escalate its tactics against those who believe they are entitled to free speech, it serves as a stark reminder of the lengths to which they will go to quash dissent.
A fair and balanced education should include the input of parents, not a federal crackdown on concerned citizens. The implications of this campaign against parents represent a growing erosion of liberty that many Americans hold dear.
With the revelations of this internal clashing within the DOJ, there is hope that the voices echoing in school board meetings will not be silenced. Indeed, the necessity for parental involvement in education has never been more critical, as they advocate not only for their children but for the future of American values.
Sources:
rairfoundation.com
justthenews.com
thepiratescove.us
Latest News