CDC Admits Vaccine-Autism Link: Parents Demand Answers
Submitted by MAGA Student
Posted 3 hours ago
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has made a surprising admission on its website, quietly updating its long-standing position regarding the relationship between vaccines and autism.
This update, brought to light by attorney Aaron Siri, marks a significant shift, stating that studies “have not ruled out the possibility” that infant vaccines contribute to autism.
For years, the CDC had firmly maintained the narrative that vaccines do not cause autism, but this recent change raises critical questions about the assertions made by federal health agencies.
According to the CDC’s updated language, various studies have failed to conclusively prove that vaccines are entirely safe in this regard.
Importantly, the CDC noted that a 2010 study indicated a three-fold increase in autism reports among infants vaccinated within their first month of life compared to those who were not vaccinated.
This revelation follows a period of increasing scrutiny and mounting legal challenges to the CDC's long-revered claims.
Critics have long argued that the CDC and other health authorities have glossed over credible research linking vaccines to neurodevelopmental disorders while suppressing dissenting opinions. The agency now acknowledges the existence of “serious methodological limitations” in studies concerning the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine—the most heavily scrutinized in the ongoing autism debate.
Despite earlier denials, the CDC’s recent admission raises concerns over long-standing public health messaging that lacked robust scientific backing.
The implications of this shift are significant and have sparked accusations that the CDC may have previously prioritized a narrative that protects big pharmaceutical interests over genuine public health concerns.
Parents have increasingly called for transparency and an independent look at vaccine safety.
Discussions about vaccine safety are not merely academic; they have real implications for family health policies across the nation.
As the conversation continues, the need for independent research remains urgent.
The CDC’s revised claims suggest that the science surrounding vaccines and autism is far from settled, and a considerable demand for further investigation is more crucial now than ever before.
In light of these developments, parents and advocates are right to seek clarity on the safety of childhood vaccinations—a conversation that could reshape public health policy in the years to come.
Sources:
naturalnews.com
ijr.com
twitchy.com
This update, brought to light by attorney Aaron Siri, marks a significant shift, stating that studies “have not ruled out the possibility” that infant vaccines contribute to autism.
For years, the CDC had firmly maintained the narrative that vaccines do not cause autism, but this recent change raises critical questions about the assertions made by federal health agencies.
According to the CDC’s updated language, various studies have failed to conclusively prove that vaccines are entirely safe in this regard.
Importantly, the CDC noted that a 2010 study indicated a three-fold increase in autism reports among infants vaccinated within their first month of life compared to those who were not vaccinated.
This revelation follows a period of increasing scrutiny and mounting legal challenges to the CDC's long-revered claims.
Critics have long argued that the CDC and other health authorities have glossed over credible research linking vaccines to neurodevelopmental disorders while suppressing dissenting opinions. The agency now acknowledges the existence of “serious methodological limitations” in studies concerning the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine—the most heavily scrutinized in the ongoing autism debate.
Despite earlier denials, the CDC’s recent admission raises concerns over long-standing public health messaging that lacked robust scientific backing.
The implications of this shift are significant and have sparked accusations that the CDC may have previously prioritized a narrative that protects big pharmaceutical interests over genuine public health concerns.
Parents have increasingly called for transparency and an independent look at vaccine safety.
Discussions about vaccine safety are not merely academic; they have real implications for family health policies across the nation.
As the conversation continues, the need for independent research remains urgent.
The CDC’s revised claims suggest that the science surrounding vaccines and autism is far from settled, and a considerable demand for further investigation is more crucial now than ever before.
In light of these developments, parents and advocates are right to seek clarity on the safety of childhood vaccinations—a conversation that could reshape public health policy in the years to come.
Sources:
naturalnews.com
ijr.com
twitchy.com
Latest News