FBI Warnings Ignored Before January 6th Capitol Riot
Submitted by MAGA Student
Posted 2 hours ago
The January 6, 2021, Capitol riot remains a deeply contentious issue, and new revelations about the events leading up to that day are stirring debate.
Recent disclosures indicate that multiple FBI informants had warned of potential armed violence at the Capitol prior to the riot.
These warnings were reportedly not disseminated properly, raising questions about the handling of intelligence on that fateful day.
Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., who chairs the House Judiciary subcommittee investigating the January 6 events, stated that he was shocked by the level of specific threats communicated to the FBI from informants embedded within radical groups.
According to Loudermilk, these warnings were clear and frequent, yet the necessary precautions were not taken to ensure security on the Capitol grounds.
“In the lead-up to January 6, the intelligence reports were red flags,” he said. “It's hard to believe the FBI did not know the extent of the threats.”
The informants, who had foresight of possible violence, stressed that elements within the gathered crowd aimed to attack the Capitol.
One significant takeaway from the investigation is that it was not merely a spontaneous gathering gone awry; the potential for violence was anticipated weeks, even days, in advance.
This intel presents an alarming narrative that contradicts the initially understood timeline of events, raising larger questions about the motive and management of law enforcement on that day.
While various right-wing groups, such as the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, have been scrutinized, Loudermilk emphasized that even elements of Antifa were expected to be involved, a revelation underscoring a broader threat landscape.
“The FBI had to know there was something wrong, otherwise, why would they have informants in the crowd?” the congressman added, advocating for transparency in understanding how intelligence failures may have contributed to the violence.
The broader implications of this intelligence failure are significant as well.
If top officials within the FBI and Capitol Police had access to such precise warnings but failed to act appropriately, it could indicate a systemic issue within these institutions regarding political bias and operational effectiveness.
Such a scenario raises the specter of mismanagement during a time of crisis, undermining public confidence and diminishing trust in federal agencies.
In light of these findings, it is imperative that Congress investigates further to ascertain whether intelligence was withheld deliberately or if the failure to act was simply a matter of bureaucratic negligence.
As the nation continues to grapple with the consequences of January 6, transparency, accountability, and thorough investigation remain crucial.
The troubling acknowledgment of a potential intelligence oversight not only calls into question the narrative surrounding the Capitol riot but also reflects larger issues of governance that resonate deeply with Americans across the political spectrum.
Sources:
justthenews.com
justthenews.com
theblaze.com
Recent disclosures indicate that multiple FBI informants had warned of potential armed violence at the Capitol prior to the riot.
These warnings were reportedly not disseminated properly, raising questions about the handling of intelligence on that fateful day.
Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., who chairs the House Judiciary subcommittee investigating the January 6 events, stated that he was shocked by the level of specific threats communicated to the FBI from informants embedded within radical groups.
According to Loudermilk, these warnings were clear and frequent, yet the necessary precautions were not taken to ensure security on the Capitol grounds.
“In the lead-up to January 6, the intelligence reports were red flags,” he said. “It's hard to believe the FBI did not know the extent of the threats.”
The informants, who had foresight of possible violence, stressed that elements within the gathered crowd aimed to attack the Capitol.
One significant takeaway from the investigation is that it was not merely a spontaneous gathering gone awry; the potential for violence was anticipated weeks, even days, in advance.
This intel presents an alarming narrative that contradicts the initially understood timeline of events, raising larger questions about the motive and management of law enforcement on that day.
While various right-wing groups, such as the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, have been scrutinized, Loudermilk emphasized that even elements of Antifa were expected to be involved, a revelation underscoring a broader threat landscape.
“The FBI had to know there was something wrong, otherwise, why would they have informants in the crowd?” the congressman added, advocating for transparency in understanding how intelligence failures may have contributed to the violence.
The broader implications of this intelligence failure are significant as well.
If top officials within the FBI and Capitol Police had access to such precise warnings but failed to act appropriately, it could indicate a systemic issue within these institutions regarding political bias and operational effectiveness.
Such a scenario raises the specter of mismanagement during a time of crisis, undermining public confidence and diminishing trust in federal agencies.
In light of these findings, it is imperative that Congress investigates further to ascertain whether intelligence was withheld deliberately or if the failure to act was simply a matter of bureaucratic negligence.
As the nation continues to grapple with the consequences of January 6, transparency, accountability, and thorough investigation remain crucial.
The troubling acknowledgment of a potential intelligence oversight not only calls into question the narrative surrounding the Capitol riot but also reflects larger issues of governance that resonate deeply with Americans across the political spectrum.
Sources:
justthenews.com
justthenews.com
theblaze.com
Latest News