CDC Lawsuit Reveals Zero Evidence For Vaccine Safety
Submitted by MAGA Student
Posted 12 hours ago
**Bombshell Lawsuit Exposes CDC's Lack of Evidence on Vaccine Safety Claims**
In a startling revelation, a lawsuit against the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has brought to light that the federal agency lacks any substantial evidence to support its long-standing assertion that vaccines do not cause autism.
The lawsuit, initiated by the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), challenged the CDC's claims regarding vaccine safety, specifically demanding proof of research backing their position.
Del Bigtree, founder of ICAN, unveiled shocking details during a recent interview stating that the CDC was unable to produce any studies that would underpin its claims regarding various vaccines, including those like DTaP and Hepatitis B—vaccines that are routinely administered to infants.
The admission came after a protracted legal battle where the CDC, after much pressure, conceded that it had "ZERO" evidence to validate its assertions.
Bigtree pointed out that the CDC's website boldly proclaims, “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism.” Yet when pressed, they could not provide a single study related to critical vaccines in question.
Instead, the CDC resorted to citing studies that were unrelated to the specific vaccines or ingredients that ICAN highlighted, including only one study linked to DTaP, which ultimately concluded that it could not specifically confirm that DTaP does not cause autism.
Interestingly, this particular study, commissioned by the CDC itself, raised more questions than it answered, as it identified no supporting research to uphold the vaccine's safety concerning autism.
As this troubling information unfolds, many are left questioning the integrity of the CDC's claims.
The agency's regular critiques of concerns regarding vaccine safety as being “unscientific” now come under scrutiny.
This lawsuit not only challenges the CDC's narrative but also raises critical discussions about the agency's reliance on insufficient data while promoting public health policies.
With increasing apprehension about vaccine safety, especially amid the rise of vaccine mandates in recent years, the implications of this lawsuit could have far-reaching effects on public trust in health institutions.
As debate continues, it remains to be seen how this revelation will influence the conversation surrounding vaccines and public health moving forward.
The absence of scientific backing from a major health agency is concerning and calls for a thorough reevaluation of how vaccine safety is assessed and communicated to the public.
Sources:
twitchy.com
dailysceptic.org
slaynews.com
In a startling revelation, a lawsuit against the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has brought to light that the federal agency lacks any substantial evidence to support its long-standing assertion that vaccines do not cause autism.
The lawsuit, initiated by the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), challenged the CDC's claims regarding vaccine safety, specifically demanding proof of research backing their position.
Del Bigtree, founder of ICAN, unveiled shocking details during a recent interview stating that the CDC was unable to produce any studies that would underpin its claims regarding various vaccines, including those like DTaP and Hepatitis B—vaccines that are routinely administered to infants.
The admission came after a protracted legal battle where the CDC, after much pressure, conceded that it had "ZERO" evidence to validate its assertions.
Bigtree pointed out that the CDC's website boldly proclaims, “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism.” Yet when pressed, they could not provide a single study related to critical vaccines in question.
Instead, the CDC resorted to citing studies that were unrelated to the specific vaccines or ingredients that ICAN highlighted, including only one study linked to DTaP, which ultimately concluded that it could not specifically confirm that DTaP does not cause autism.
Interestingly, this particular study, commissioned by the CDC itself, raised more questions than it answered, as it identified no supporting research to uphold the vaccine's safety concerning autism.
As this troubling information unfolds, many are left questioning the integrity of the CDC's claims.
The agency's regular critiques of concerns regarding vaccine safety as being “unscientific” now come under scrutiny.
This lawsuit not only challenges the CDC's narrative but also raises critical discussions about the agency's reliance on insufficient data while promoting public health policies.
With increasing apprehension about vaccine safety, especially amid the rise of vaccine mandates in recent years, the implications of this lawsuit could have far-reaching effects on public trust in health institutions.
As debate continues, it remains to be seen how this revelation will influence the conversation surrounding vaccines and public health moving forward.
The absence of scientific backing from a major health agency is concerning and calls for a thorough reevaluation of how vaccine safety is assessed and communicated to the public.
Sources:
twitchy.com
dailysceptic.org
slaynews.com
Latest News