ABC Debate Bias Against Trump: Moderators Exposed
Submitted by MAGA Student
Posted 4 days ago
**Bias Exposed: ABC Moderators Reveal Agenda Against Donald Trump**
In a shocking admission, a co-moderator of the recent ABC presidential debate has inadvertently exposed the bias against Republican nominee Donald Trump.
Linsey Davis, one of the debate's moderators, openly stated that their aggressive fact-checking of Trump was a calculated move to avoid the same fate that befell President Biden in earlier debates.
This staggering revelation comes after a series of debates where Trump faced what many observers have described as a coordinated effort from moderators and opponents alike.
The debate quickly turned into what some have called a three-on-one onslaught against Trump, with rules being altered at the last minute—undoubtedly at the request of the Harris campaign.
Davis's comments raise serious concerns about the integrity of the debate process. They insinuate that the moderators were more focused on protecting Kamala Harris than ensuring a fair exchange of ideas between candidates.
Moreover, the relentless fact-checking of Trump, often hinging on dubious claims, adds to the narrative that mainstream media will stop at nothing to undermine Republican candidates.
While this bias may not stir the elite pundit class to call for reform in how debates are managed, it certainly highlights the stark contrast between how Trump is treated versus his Democratic counterparts.
As we head into an election year, the credibility of these debates is at stake.
Trump's earlier announcement to withdraw from future debates may be echoed by many who see these forums as rigged against conservative values and ideals.
As this debate cycle progresses, the question remains whether the American public will recognize these tactics for what they truly are: an attempt to stifle conservative voices in favor of a narrative that promotes the left's agenda.
Sources:
justthenews.com
redstate.com
yahoo.com
In a shocking admission, a co-moderator of the recent ABC presidential debate has inadvertently exposed the bias against Republican nominee Donald Trump.
Linsey Davis, one of the debate's moderators, openly stated that their aggressive fact-checking of Trump was a calculated move to avoid the same fate that befell President Biden in earlier debates.
This staggering revelation comes after a series of debates where Trump faced what many observers have described as a coordinated effort from moderators and opponents alike.
The debate quickly turned into what some have called a three-on-one onslaught against Trump, with rules being altered at the last minute—undoubtedly at the request of the Harris campaign.
Davis's comments raise serious concerns about the integrity of the debate process. They insinuate that the moderators were more focused on protecting Kamala Harris than ensuring a fair exchange of ideas between candidates.
Moreover, the relentless fact-checking of Trump, often hinging on dubious claims, adds to the narrative that mainstream media will stop at nothing to undermine Republican candidates.
While this bias may not stir the elite pundit class to call for reform in how debates are managed, it certainly highlights the stark contrast between how Trump is treated versus his Democratic counterparts.
As we head into an election year, the credibility of these debates is at stake.
Trump's earlier announcement to withdraw from future debates may be echoed by many who see these forums as rigged against conservative values and ideals.
As this debate cycle progresses, the question remains whether the American public will recognize these tactics for what they truly are: an attempt to stifle conservative voices in favor of a narrative that promotes the left's agenda.
Sources:
justthenews.com
redstate.com
yahoo.com
Latest News