Debate Bias: Trump Challenged While Harris Escapes Scrutiny
Submitted by MAGA Student
Posted 6 days ago
**Debate Chaos: Kamala Harris’s Lies Go Unchecked While Trump Faces Hostile Moderation**
During the recent presidential debate, the glaring bias of ABC News became painfully evident as former President Donald Trump faced not just his opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, but also moderators who seemed intent on playing the role of adversaries.
The debate, which was billed as a chance for voters to hear from both candidates, quickly turned into an interrogation of Trump.
Incredibly, moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-checked Trump a staggering eleven times, yet they let Harris slide with falsehoods on key issues.
Harris’s assertion that Trump left them with the worst unemployment rate since the Great Depression was swiftly countered by actual data showing an unemployment rate of 6.4% when Trump left office, a significant recovery from pandemic lows.
Moreover, Harris’s claims regarding late-term abortion were equally misleading, as states across the country still permit such procedures, contradicting her statement that abortions do not occur at that stage.
The so-called "fine people" controversy surrounding Trump again reared its head during the debate.
Harris reiterated the false narrative that Trump praised neo-Nazis during the Charlottesville rally, despite the fact that Trump explicitly denounced those groups, clarifying that he was speaking about peaceful protesters when he referenced “fine people.”
In a particularly astonishing moment, Harris accused Trump of wanting to monitor every pregnancy in America, a claim that has been thoroughly discredited by multiple fact-checkers.
The arguments went beyond mere policy disputes, with Harris asserting Trump’s alleged support for infanticide when she dismissed concerns about the result of failed abortions.
Yet the moderators offered no pushback on her clear misrepresentation of facts surrounding this sensitive issue.
Once again, it was a debate designed to pit Trump against a series of unchallenged claims, with Harris’s fabrications bubbling to the surface without scrutiny.
Republican Senator Tom Cotton voiced what many were thinking when he stated unequivocally that the debate felt like a “3-on-1” matchup.
In truth, the failure of the moderators to hold Harris accountable is a reflection of a broader pattern within the mainstream media—an inclination to shield Democratic politicians from scrutiny while bombarding their Republican counterparts with relentless fact-checking.
As the smoke from the debate settles, one cannot help but feel that the true nature of these interactions, plagued by bias and misinformation, will ultimately shape the landscape leading into the crucial election in November.
It is imperative that voters are made aware of the claims allowed to pass unchecked, ensuring that all Americans can cast their ballots based on a foundation of truth, rather than half-truths and outright lies.
Sources:
truthbasedmedia.com
thenationalpulse.com
washingtonstand.com
During the recent presidential debate, the glaring bias of ABC News became painfully evident as former President Donald Trump faced not just his opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, but also moderators who seemed intent on playing the role of adversaries.
The debate, which was billed as a chance for voters to hear from both candidates, quickly turned into an interrogation of Trump.
Incredibly, moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-checked Trump a staggering eleven times, yet they let Harris slide with falsehoods on key issues.
Harris’s assertion that Trump left them with the worst unemployment rate since the Great Depression was swiftly countered by actual data showing an unemployment rate of 6.4% when Trump left office, a significant recovery from pandemic lows.
Moreover, Harris’s claims regarding late-term abortion were equally misleading, as states across the country still permit such procedures, contradicting her statement that abortions do not occur at that stage.
The so-called "fine people" controversy surrounding Trump again reared its head during the debate.
Harris reiterated the false narrative that Trump praised neo-Nazis during the Charlottesville rally, despite the fact that Trump explicitly denounced those groups, clarifying that he was speaking about peaceful protesters when he referenced “fine people.”
In a particularly astonishing moment, Harris accused Trump of wanting to monitor every pregnancy in America, a claim that has been thoroughly discredited by multiple fact-checkers.
The arguments went beyond mere policy disputes, with Harris asserting Trump’s alleged support for infanticide when she dismissed concerns about the result of failed abortions.
Yet the moderators offered no pushback on her clear misrepresentation of facts surrounding this sensitive issue.
Once again, it was a debate designed to pit Trump against a series of unchallenged claims, with Harris’s fabrications bubbling to the surface without scrutiny.
Republican Senator Tom Cotton voiced what many were thinking when he stated unequivocally that the debate felt like a “3-on-1” matchup.
In truth, the failure of the moderators to hold Harris accountable is a reflection of a broader pattern within the mainstream media—an inclination to shield Democratic politicians from scrutiny while bombarding their Republican counterparts with relentless fact-checking.
As the smoke from the debate settles, one cannot help but feel that the true nature of these interactions, plagued by bias and misinformation, will ultimately shape the landscape leading into the crucial election in November.
It is imperative that voters are made aware of the claims allowed to pass unchecked, ensuring that all Americans can cast their ballots based on a foundation of truth, rather than half-truths and outright lies.
Sources:
truthbasedmedia.com
thenationalpulse.com
washingtonstand.com
Latest News