Kamala Harris’s Crime Narrative Unmasked by Critics
Submitted by MAGA Student
Posted 10 days ago
**Deception**
California lawmakers and former police officers are taking a stand against Vice President Kamala Harris, accusing her of fabricating a "tough on drugs" persona that sharply contrasts with her actual record as San Francisco’s District Attorney.
Republican Representative Kevin Kiley criticized Harris's campaign narrative, asserting that her administration championed progressive policies that undermined public safety.
"This campaign is attempting to completely reinvent reality," Kiley said. "Those of us who have lived in California know all too well what the reality was."
During her tenure, Harris advocated for a policy that limited prosecutions of drug dealers until they had been caught three times, a strategy officers deemed ineffective for maintaining safety.
Kevin Cashman, a former deputy chief of the San Francisco Police Department, explained that while Harris labeled the initiative "Operation Safe Streets," law enforcement officers dubbed it "Catch and Release."
This harsh critique comes as the Harris campaign seeks to reframe her image as a strict law enforcement advocate in response to the changing political landscape ahead of the presidential election.
John McGinness, former Sacramento County sheriff, echoed that sentiment, adding, “The claims of being tough on crime do not align with the truth. She embraced a hands-off approach.”
As Harris ramps up her campaign under this misleading narrative, critics condemn her misleading portrayal, especially as she attempts to position herself as a competent leader on controversial issues.
Even her recent television advertisements, claiming a commitment to crime control, have drawn scorn, particularly given her past statements against measures like the southern border wall, which she now appears to support.
As the race heats up, it becomes increasingly crucial for voters to discern the truth behind Harris’s claims and examine the record she left in California.
As past defenders of law and order weigh in, it’s clear that many believe she is not the candidate that Americans can trust to uphold their safety and security.
Sources:
freebeacon.com
lifezette.com
wnd.com
California lawmakers and former police officers are taking a stand against Vice President Kamala Harris, accusing her of fabricating a "tough on drugs" persona that sharply contrasts with her actual record as San Francisco’s District Attorney.
Republican Representative Kevin Kiley criticized Harris's campaign narrative, asserting that her administration championed progressive policies that undermined public safety.
"This campaign is attempting to completely reinvent reality," Kiley said. "Those of us who have lived in California know all too well what the reality was."
During her tenure, Harris advocated for a policy that limited prosecutions of drug dealers until they had been caught three times, a strategy officers deemed ineffective for maintaining safety.
Kevin Cashman, a former deputy chief of the San Francisco Police Department, explained that while Harris labeled the initiative "Operation Safe Streets," law enforcement officers dubbed it "Catch and Release."
This harsh critique comes as the Harris campaign seeks to reframe her image as a strict law enforcement advocate in response to the changing political landscape ahead of the presidential election.
John McGinness, former Sacramento County sheriff, echoed that sentiment, adding, “The claims of being tough on crime do not align with the truth. She embraced a hands-off approach.”
As Harris ramps up her campaign under this misleading narrative, critics condemn her misleading portrayal, especially as she attempts to position herself as a competent leader on controversial issues.
Even her recent television advertisements, claiming a commitment to crime control, have drawn scorn, particularly given her past statements against measures like the southern border wall, which she now appears to support.
As the race heats up, it becomes increasingly crucial for voters to discern the truth behind Harris’s claims and examine the record she left in California.
As past defenders of law and order weigh in, it’s clear that many believe she is not the candidate that Americans can trust to uphold their safety and security.
Sources:
freebeacon.com
lifezette.com
wnd.com
Latest News