WHO's Monkeypox Vaccination Plan Raises Serious Concerns
Submitted by MAGA Student
Posted 15 days ago
The World Health Organization's (WHO) response to the Monkeypox outbreak has come under scrutiny from a South African group dedicated to vaccine injury awareness.
The SA Vaccine Injury Medico-Legal Study Group has publicly criticized the WHO's decision to ramp up Monkeypox vaccine distribution, which was recently declared an emergency by African health authorities.
In a statement released on August 18, the group outlined several serious concerns regarding the safety and necessity of the proposed Monkeypox vaccination program.
They noted that the vaccine being administered is essentially a Smallpox vaccine, which carries known risks and may not even effectively address the current Monkeypox strain.
Significantly, the group raised alarms about the potential for future vaccines to incorporate mRNA technology. Many, particularly within conservative circles, have become wary of this technology following its use during the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, where its safety was fiercely debated.
Furthermore, the group argues that the target demographic for the vaccination campaign may not receive adequate informed consent, given their unique characteristics and circumstances.
The statement also highlights the fact that Monkeypox is primarily transmitted through sexual contact, specifically among men who have sex with men. This raises questions about the necessity of a widespread vaccination program that could potentially affect a much larger population.
Amidst these concerns, there is speculation surrounding the legitimacy of the so-called Monkeypox pandemic itself. Many believe that the public health response may be disproportionate to the actual risk posed by the disease.
Notably, Dr. Peter McCullough has pointed out that the symptoms associated with Monkeypox often correlate with specific behaviors rather than a widespread threat to public health. He emphasized that previous government declarations regarding Monkeypox created unnecessary panic, as the disease manifests largely in a rash found predominantly in certain populations.
As vaccination efforts continue across the United States, some are left to wonder: Does this narrative of crisis truly reflect an urgent public health need, or is it another case of overreach by health officials who may benefit from fear-based policies?
With a shift in public discourse around vaccines and health mandates, these developments call for a robust discussion on the appropriateness of such measures, and whether they align with American values of consent and personal choice.
As scrutiny of WHO's and national health officials' motives intensifies, it's essential that citizens remain informed and vigilant regarding ongoing health initiatives that may not consider the complete picture.
Sources:
infowars.com
brownstone.org
rumble.com
The SA Vaccine Injury Medico-Legal Study Group has publicly criticized the WHO's decision to ramp up Monkeypox vaccine distribution, which was recently declared an emergency by African health authorities.
In a statement released on August 18, the group outlined several serious concerns regarding the safety and necessity of the proposed Monkeypox vaccination program.
They noted that the vaccine being administered is essentially a Smallpox vaccine, which carries known risks and may not even effectively address the current Monkeypox strain.
Significantly, the group raised alarms about the potential for future vaccines to incorporate mRNA technology. Many, particularly within conservative circles, have become wary of this technology following its use during the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, where its safety was fiercely debated.
Furthermore, the group argues that the target demographic for the vaccination campaign may not receive adequate informed consent, given their unique characteristics and circumstances.
The statement also highlights the fact that Monkeypox is primarily transmitted through sexual contact, specifically among men who have sex with men. This raises questions about the necessity of a widespread vaccination program that could potentially affect a much larger population.
Amidst these concerns, there is speculation surrounding the legitimacy of the so-called Monkeypox pandemic itself. Many believe that the public health response may be disproportionate to the actual risk posed by the disease.
Notably, Dr. Peter McCullough has pointed out that the symptoms associated with Monkeypox often correlate with specific behaviors rather than a widespread threat to public health. He emphasized that previous government declarations regarding Monkeypox created unnecessary panic, as the disease manifests largely in a rash found predominantly in certain populations.
As vaccination efforts continue across the United States, some are left to wonder: Does this narrative of crisis truly reflect an urgent public health need, or is it another case of overreach by health officials who may benefit from fear-based policies?
With a shift in public discourse around vaccines and health mandates, these developments call for a robust discussion on the appropriateness of such measures, and whether they align with American values of consent and personal choice.
As scrutiny of WHO's and national health officials' motives intensifies, it's essential that citizens remain informed and vigilant regarding ongoing health initiatives that may not consider the complete picture.
Sources:
infowars.com
brownstone.org
rumble.com
Latest News