The ACLU just stated a position that goes against the very reason it even exists

The ACLU has now become a charter member of the speech police. The Wall Street journal is reporting the ACLU no longer believes all speech should be protected. The ACLU has declared that speech it doesn’t like can ‘inflict serious harms’ and ‘impede progress.’

From wsj.com


The American Civil Liberties Union has explicitly endorsed the view that free speech can harm “marginalized” groups by undermining their civil rights. “Speech that denigrates such groups can inflict serious harms and is intended to and often will impede progress toward equality,” the ACLU declares in new guidelines governing case selection and “Conflicts Between Competing Values or Priorities.”

This is presented as an explanation rather than a change of policy, and free-speech advocates know the ACLU has already lost its zeal for vigorously defending the speech it hates. ACLU leaders previously avoided acknowledging that retreat, however, in the apparent hope of preserving its reputation as the nation’s premier champion of the First Amendment.

But traditional free-speech values do not appeal to the ACLU’s increasingly partisan progressive constituency—especially after the 2017 white-supremacist rally in Charlottesville. The Virginia ACLU affiliate rightly represented the rally’s organizers when the city attempted to deny them a permit to assemble. Responding to intense post-Charlottesville criticism, last year the ACLU reconsidered its obligation to represent white-supremacist protesters.

The 2018 guidelines claim that “the ACLU is committed to defending speech rights without regard to whether the views expressed are consistent with or opposed to the ACLU’s core values, priorities and goals.” But directly contradicting that assertion, they also cite as a reason to decline taking a free-speech case “the extent to which the speech may assist in advancing the goals of white supremacists or others whose views are contrary to our values.”

In selecting speech cases to defend, the ACLU will now balance the “impact of the proposed speech and the impact of its suppression.” Factors like the potential effect of the speech on “marginalized communities” and even on “the ACLU’s credibility” could militate against taking a case. Fundraising and communications officials helped formulate the new guidelines.


There are so many indicators that prove these leftist outbursts have nothing to do with the "issues" they claim to embrace. It's purely about destabilizing our constitutional government. This truly is an ideological war.

In promoting the idea that free speech undermines anyone's civil rights, the ACLU have surrendered any claim of protecting individual rights under the U.S. Constitution in favor of the politicization of their own viewpoint. They have taken one more step down the road to irrelevance.


Posted Thursday, June 21, 2018

Latest News